Following this puts new work involving it at the top of your briefing, with a note saying why it is there. Links are taken from the source record, never inferred.
Three uncontrolled case reports of a salvage therapy in treatment-refractory merkel cell carcinoma, showing feasibility and safety but limited efficacy; early evidence requiring prospective study.
A narrative review synthesizing heterogeneous observational studies with acknowledged limited and incompletely understood evidence; raises questions about HIV–ovarian cancer association rather than establishing a definitive answer.
A clinically oriented mini-review synthesizing current evidence on MCC epidemiology, diagnosis, staging, prognostic factors, and multidisciplinary management for dermatologists; no new primary data or trial results reported.
A single case report with atypical clinical presentation and mechanistic speculation; describes one patient's course without a control group or comparative data, raising a signal rather than establishing causation.
A well-designed single-arm phase II trial with clear efficacy signals (70.8% ORR) and good tolerability, but lacks a control arm and requires randomised confirmation in a larger cohort.
Single-centre in vitro work in bladder cancer cells demonstrating a novel viral engineering concept with surrogate endpoints (replication, lysis, particle formation) but no clinical outcomes, animal models, or comparative efficacy data.
This is an epitope discovery and validation study using in vitro immunological assays and patient-derived models, establishing feasibility for vaccine development but lacking clinical efficacy data or Phase trial results.