Following this puts new work involving it at the top of your briefing, with a note saying why it is there. Links are taken from the source record, never inferred.
A narrative review synthesizing mechanistic concepts and therapeutic potential of lectin–glycan interactions in cancer immunity, raising questions rather than reporting empirical results or clinical outcomes.
This is a mechanistic review discussing potential strategies to restore MHC-I in CNS cancers, raising questions about therapeutic approaches rather than presenting experimental results or clinical evidence.
A narrative mechanism-based review synthesizing evidence across drug classes to guide clinical decision-making in cervical cancer treatment, without presenting original trial data or meta-analytic synthesis.
Mechanistic study in syngeneic and humanized mouse models demonstrating a novel immunological pathway; lacks efficacy data from human trials and is not powered to establish clinical benefit.
This is a narrative review synthesizing mechanistic evidence and preclinical models with conflicting human data, proposing a framework rather than reporting a new empirical result; the only completed Phase 3 trial (pegilodecakin) failed its primary endpoint.
Single-centre observational study applying a previously developed algorithm to correlative genomic and immune data without experimental validation, prospective clinical outcome assessment, or comparison to an independent cohort.
A mechanistic preclinical study in a murine model showing synergistic efficacy of a novel vaccine-adjuvant combination with PD-1 blockade, with supporting immunological data but requiring clinical translation.
This is a narrative review that raises questions and summarizes progress rather than reporting empirical results with effect sizes or comparative outcomes to answer them.