Following this puts new work involving it at the top of your briefing, with a note saying why it is there. Links are taken from the source record, never inferred.
A narrative review synthesizing current evidence on immunotherapy in advanced biliary tract cancer, highlighting established standards (TOPAZ-1, KEYNOTE-966), emerging biomarkers, and investigational approaches rather than reporting original trial results.
This is a mechanistic review proposing a framework for model selection in MASH research; it raises questions about which experimental systems best interrogate specific biological pathways rather than testing a defined clinical hypothesis with empirical data.
Large population-based retrospective administrative study with robust sample size and clear epidemiologic findings, but uses diagnostic coding and medication dispensation as case identification without clinical validation, limiting causal inference and generalizability beyond Brazil's public system.
A single clinical case report with autopsy findings that illustrates a rare disease presentation; descriptive evidence useful for differential diagnosis but without comparative or interventional data.
This is a narrative review synthesizing mechanistic pathways and existing evidence rather than presenting original clinical data or trial results, raising questions about the menopause-obesity-MASH axis rather than answering them with new evidence.
Retrospective observational study without causal inference; primary associations become non-significant after adjustment for confounders, limiting clinical actionability.
A multicenter retrospective study showing improved survival and response rates with triple-combination therapy in advanced ICC, but limited by non-randomized design and moderate sample size that requires prospective confirmation.
Small retrospective single-centre cohort (n=26) with exploratory design and no powered comparisons; establishes real-world tolerability and PFS data but lacks control group and prospective validation.