Following this puts new work involving it at the top of your briefing, with a note saying why it is there. Links are taken from the source record, never inferred.
A qualitative implementation assessment of a surveillance strategy in a single country, without quantitative metrics, comparators, or outcome data; provides descriptive findings useful for local policy but lacks the rigor and generalizability of confirmatory or strong evidence.
A qualitative, narrative-driven ethnographic analysis exploring field epidemiology as political practice through a single measles outbreak case study; raises conceptual questions rather than testing causal claims or providing quantified evidence.
A conceptual framework and maturity model for implementing One Health Intelligence systems; provides operational guidance for integrated zoonotic disease preparedness without empirical outcome data.
A narrative review synthesizing evidence on epidemiology, diagnostics, and public health implications of B. canis infection, identifying knowledge gaps and recommending improvements to clinical awareness and surveillance.
A narrative review synthesizing evidence on pandemic risk drivers and surveillance gaps, offering expert consensus on systemic weaknesses and policy recommendations rather than reporting primary empirical results.
A 30-year mixed-methods programme evaluation with descriptive survey data and qualitative analysis that demonstrates graduate retention and reported satisfaction, but lacks comparison groups, objective outcome measures, or causal inference about workforce impact.
A scoping review identifying nursing contributions to One Health across eight descriptive documents with no outcome evaluations, establishing landscape and research gaps rather than testing interventions or providing evidence of effectiveness.
A pilot descriptive surveillance study from four district hospitals establishing disease presence and epidemiological patterns, but lacking a comparator, control group, or analytical design to test hypotheses.