Following this puts new work involving it at the top of your briefing, with a note saying why it is there. Links are taken from the source record, never inferred.
A conceptual framework and maturity model for implementing One Health Intelligence systems; provides operational guidance for integrated zoonotic disease preparedness without empirical outcome data.
A narrative review synthesizing evidence on epidemiology, diagnostics, and public health implications of B. canis infection, identifying knowledge gaps and recommending improvements to clinical awareness and surveillance.
A narrative review synthesizing evidence on pandemic risk drivers and surveillance gaps, offering expert consensus on systemic weaknesses and policy recommendations rather than reporting primary empirical results.
A 30-year mixed-methods programme evaluation with descriptive survey data and qualitative analysis that demonstrates graduate retention and reported satisfaction, but lacks comparison groups, objective outcome measures, or causal inference about workforce impact.
A scoping review identifying nursing contributions to One Health across eight descriptive documents with no outcome evaluations, establishing landscape and research gaps rather than testing interventions or providing evidence of effectiveness.
A pilot descriptive surveillance study from four district hospitals establishing disease presence and epidemiological patterns, but lacking a comparator, control group, or analytical design to test hypotheses.
A narrative expert consensus and framework paper outlining One Health principles and digital transformation priorities for pediatric infectious disease practice, rather than reporting original research evidence.
Systematic analysis of established surveillance data (GBD Study) showing documented trends in infectious disease and AMR burden in India; confirms the ongoing epidemiologic importance of AMR with quantified changes, but is a descriptive epidemiologic study, not an intervention trial or novel mechanistic finding.