Following this puts new work involving it at the top of your briefing, with a note saying why it is there. Links are taken from the source record, never inferred.
A systematic review synthesizing current evidence on monkeypox epidemiology, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and prevention strategies, providing a comprehensive overview for clinicians and public health professionals rather than reporting a novel primary finding or intervention outcome.
International Journal of Scientific Research Studies
Single-centre descriptive cross-sectional survey of self-reported knowledge and practice with moderate response rate, no control group, and no statistically significant associations detected; raises questions about surveillance gaps but lacks analytical power to drive practice change.
A qualitative implementation assessment of a surveillance strategy in a single country, without quantitative metrics, comparators, or outcome data; provides descriptive findings useful for local policy but lacks the rigor and generalizability of confirmatory or strong evidence.
A systematic review synthesizing evidence on biomarkers for BCG therapy prediction in bladder cancer; provides a landscape assessment rather than a new empirical result, identifying gaps and promising directions for clinical practice.
Journal of Interventional Epidemiology and Public Health
Implementation and descriptive evaluation of a capacity-building program with before-after comparisons and interrupted time series analysis, but no control arm and measured endpoints are operational metrics rather than clinical or health outcomes.
Nigerian Journal of Biotechnology and Life Sciences
A narrative review synthesizing fever phobia, antimicrobial resistance, and One Health concepts to recommend clinical practice standardization and educational interventions, without presenting primary trial data.
A narrative review synthesizing evidence on pandemic risk drivers and surveillance gaps, offering expert consensus on systemic weaknesses and policy recommendations rather than reporting primary empirical results.
A 30-year mixed-methods programme evaluation with descriptive survey data and qualitative analysis that demonstrates graduate retention and reported satisfaction, but lacks comparison groups, objective outcome measures, or causal inference about workforce impact.