Following this puts new work involving it at the top of your briefing, with a note saying why it is there. Links are taken from the source record, never inferred.
A narrative review summarizing mechanistic evidence and preclinical/early translational data on the CCL2–CCR2 axis in lung cancer, without reporting original clinical trial results or definitive clinical outcomes.
A narrative review synthesizing mechanistic concepts and scattered evidence about circulating cytokines as potential biomarkers, but acknowledging inconsistency across studies and lack of validated clinical utility.
Retrospective cohort study with adjusted hazard ratios showing substantial associations between H1-antihistamine use and improved TTF and mortality in NSCLC patients on EGFR-TKIs, but observational design precludes causal inference and requires prospective confirmation.
A narrative review synthesizing preclinical structure-activity data and early-stage clinical experience to propose design principles for CXCR4 radiotheranostics; no new primary data or comparative efficacy evidence is reported.
Well-designed single-center concordance study with clear methodology and strong statistical agreement (κ=0.98) that validates interchangeability of two antibodies in routine practice, but does not establish new clinical utility or change diagnostic approach.
Mechanistic murine study with flow cytometry and imaging endpoints identifying a potential barrier to mRNA vaccine efficacy; results are hypothesis-generating rather than definitive for clinical practice.