Following this puts new work involving it at the top of your briefing, with a note saying why it is there. Links are taken from the source record, never inferred.
Single-centre retrospective laboratory surveillance study describing bacterial distribution and resistance patterns without intervention, comparator, or hypothesis testing; useful for local epidemiology but limited generalizability and no causal inference.
A descriptive point prevalence survey establishing baseline antibiotic prescribing patterns in Malawi, useful for surveillance but without comparator, intervention, or causal evidence to guide practice.
A sound single-centre prospective evaluation showing meaningful process improvements (modifications in ~50% of alerts) and substantial projected cost savings, but lacking hard clinical outcomes, resistance data, or patient-level impact measurement.
A large retrospective cohort study of 2.7 million service members over 9 years confirming known CDI epidemiology and risk factors in a distinctive military population, with clear descriptive findings but no intervention comparison or hard clinical outcomes.
This is a narrative review synthesizing mechanistic evidence on fomite transmission without presenting original empirical data, primary endpoints, or comparative effectiveness results.