Following this puts new work involving it at the top of your briefing, with a note saying why it is there. Links are taken from the source record, never inferred.
Critical Pathways in Cardiology a Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
A comprehensive narrative review synthesizing current literature on TR evaluation and management strategies, presenting expert consensus on classification, imaging, risk stratification, and therapeutic options without new primary data.
A narrative review synthesizing guideline updates and registry evidence on TAVR durability and reintervention; informs clinical decision-making but lacks original comparative effectiveness data.
Narrative review of three randomized trials showing oral immunosuppressive agents achieve outcomes comparable to drug-eluting stents after bare-metal stent implantation in selected populations, but lacks head-to-head effect sizes and calls for larger confirmatory trials.
A narrative review synthesizing randomized trials, registries, and society guidelines to establish domain-specific recommendations for the boundary between invasive and non-invasive cardiac imaging across multiple clinical scenarios.
This is a narrative review synthesizing mechanistic and preclinical evidence about lncRNAs in coronary disease; it raises research questions and presents existing knowledge rather than testing a hypothesis or reporting new clinical data.
A narrative review synthesizing current evidence and identifying unresolved questions in TAVR practice across three clinical domains, without presenting new primary data or trial results.
A systematic literature review synthesizing the evolution of coronary stent technology and design from major RCTs and meta-analyses, offering narrative synthesis of technological progress rather than a novel empirical finding.