Following this puts new work involving it at the top of your briefing, with a note saying why it is there. Links are taken from the source record, never inferred.
Exploratory machine learning study using observational data to generate causal hypotheses about cardiac metabolism in obesity and diabetes; lacks a prospective design, clinical outcome validation, or comparison against established diagnostic standards.
A retrospective nomogram development and validation study in a single centre with good discrimination metrics (AUROC 0.901) and internal validation, but based on a surrogate endpoint (elevated troponin) rather than hard clinical outcomes, limiting generalizability.
A narrative review synthesizing current evidence on circulating biomarkers in cardio-oncology, recommending multimodal assessment strategies but acknowledging gaps in validation and standardization rather than reporting new primary data.
A clinical review synthesizing mechanistic rationale, randomized trial evidence, and imaging data to propose a selective, physiology-guided framework for side branch ballooning in bifurcation PCI—positioned to inform practice rather than report a new trial result.
Hospital-based cross-sectional study with large sample and multivariate analysis showing age-specific associations between metabolic phenotypes and angiographically confirmed CAD, but lacks a prospective design and causal inference; findings in young adults are novel but require validation.
A small single-centre imaging study with surrogate endpoints (calcium score and FDG uptake) showing a signal of chemoradiotherapy-associated aortic atherosclerosis progression, but lacking hard clinical outcomes and requiring confirmation.
A pragmatic cluster-randomized trial in primary care showing CACS reduces unnecessary cardiology referrals and improves preventive enrolment, but fails on the primary outcome (practice-level CVRM registration) and detects similar OCAD rates; limited by non-blinded design, imbalanced per-protocol sample, and lack of hard clinical endpoints.
A single case report with no control group, describing a temporal association between cancer therapy and acute MI; raises a mechanistic hypothesis but provides no quantified risk or causal evidence.