Following this puts new work involving it at the top of your briefing, with a note saying why it is there. Links are taken from the source record, never inferred.
This is a viewpoint piece proposing a framework for surrogate decision-making in cancer care; it presents expert perspective and normative guidance rather than empirical evidence of efficacy or outcomes.
A methodological study replicating and stress-testing an existing risk model using observational data; findings suggest potential recalibration needs but lack a prospective design, randomization, or definitive clinical outcome to warrant stronger classification.
A descriptive economic analysis of spending patterns using administrative data; documents trends but lacks comparative design, causal inference, or clinical outcomes to support practice change.
A narrative review synthesizing evidence on financial toxicity in gynecological oncology and policy recommendations for equitable access to innovation, grounded in published literature but without new empirical data.
A descriptive cross-sectional survey of physician perceptions with no control group, experimental intervention, or clinical outcome; generates hypotheses about access barriers rather than testing them.
Mixed-methods validation study of two screening tools in a single centre with small qualitative sample (n=20), generating hypothesis that multi-measure approach may be needed rather than establishing superior measurement strategy.
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
A single-center retrospective pharmacoeconomic model with simulated dosing strategy and no clinical outcome data; findings require prospective validation before implementation.
A White Paper outlining strategic recommendations and a roadmap for international registry collaboration in lymphoma, not reporting original research findings or clinical trial data.