Following this puts new work involving it at the top of your briefing, with a note saying why it is there. Links are taken from the source record, never inferred.
A well-designed cross-sectional and longitudinal study of biomarkers in a substantial adolescent psychiatric cohort with clear measurement and modest discriminatory power, but limited by single-centre design, surrogate endpoints, and lack of clinical outcome validation.
A new reporting framework and checklist designed to improve transparency of accessibility factors in autistic health research, synthesizing evidence and participatory input to establish minimum standards for publication.
This scoping review synthesizes preclinical evidence showing molecular and behavioral improvements in rodent models of monogenic ASD, but explicitly notes absence of completed human trials and significant translational barriers, limiting practice applicability.
A narrative review synthesizing evidence on language dysfunction across psychiatric disorders in children and adolescents, identifying research gaps rather than reporting original empirical findings or clinical trials.
A cross-sectional comparative study of modest size (120 caregivers) with clear outcome measures (anxiety, depression, caregiver burden) showing higher burden in ASD than ADHD caregivers, but limited by lack of control group and absence of reported effect sizes.