Following this puts new work involving it at the top of your briefing, with a note saying why it is there. Links are taken from the source record, never inferred.
In vitro proof-of-concept study of a novel nanomaterial showing biocompatibility and physical properties favourable for dual PDT/PTT, but no efficacy data, no in vivo work, and no comparison to standard therapies.
This is an early-stage mechanistic study describing synthesis and proposed mechanism of a novel photosensitizer in prostate cancer, without clinical data or in vivo efficacy results reported.
This is a preclinical materials science study reporting rational design and in vitro/in vivo characterization of a nanoagent; it raises mechanistic questions about nanoparticle performance but does not test efficacy against a comparator in any clinical or disease model.
This systematic review of preclinical animal models raises mechanistic questions about PDT's potential to trigger systemic immunity but does not provide clinical evidence sufficient to guide practice or confirm efficacy in humans.
Phase II trial with modest sample size showing acceptable safety profile and 40% response rate for dysphagia in advanced esophageal cancer, but requires larger confirmatory studies before clinical adoption.
Sound preclinical study with in vitro biofilm efficacy and in vivo proof-of-concept in a rat caries model, but limited to animal data and lacks human clinical validation.
This is a proof-of-concept study of a novel photosensitizer design in a single tumor model with intratumoral dosing and short-term follow-up, demonstrating feasibility but lacking comparator arms, efficacy benchmarking, or systemic biodistribution data needed to establish clinical potential.