Following this puts new work involving it at the top of your briefing, with a note saying why it is there. Links are taken from the source record, never inferred.
This is a completed trial registry record with no posted results; the study design is sound but results remain unreported, making it an early-stage report that cannot yet inform clinical practice.
Observational cross-sectional neuroimaging study with no results posted; designed to identify neural biomarkers in depression but recruitment completion alone does not constitute evidence of efficacy or clinical utility.
A well-designed cross-sectional mediation analysis in a large clinical sample identifies plausible pathways between childhood trauma and suicide outcomes, but cross-sectional design prevents causal inference and limits actionability.
A rigorous observational study with propensity-score adjustment showing a clear short-term protective effect (one-year reattempt reduction) in a clinically relevant population, but limited by observational design, lack of long-term benefit, and age-specific effects that require confirmation.
Large observational cohort study with propensity-score weighting comparing antipsychotics to antidepressants for a hard clinical outcome (psychiatric emergency visits/admissions) in adolescents with difficult-to-treat depression, showing increased risk with antipsychotics and consistent results across sensitivity analyses.
This is an uncontrolled pilot study with very small planned enrollment (n=8) and no comparator arm, designed to test feasibility and gather preliminary data on a behavioral mobile app intervention for depression in African Americans.
This is a completed single-arm pre-post intervention study with no comparator group, evaluating a hybrid physiotherapy program in a small sample; results are not yet reported in this registry record.
Small, single-center, uncontrolled interventional study with recruitment completed but no results posted in registry; design and sample size insufficient to support efficacy claims.