Following this puts new work involving it at the top of your briefing, with a note saying why it is there. Links are taken from the source record, never inferred.
Preclinical in vivo study in animal models demonstrating a novel nanoparticle-PROTAC combination system; no human clinical data, efficacy compared only to implied controls, and lacks direct comparison to standard therapies.
A descriptive bibliometric analysis mapping research landscape and trends rather than testing a clinical or mechanistic hypothesis; documents publication patterns and emerging themes without presenting primary experimental or clinical evidence.
This is preclinical target discovery and validation work using in vitro and animal models; it establishes MPZL1 as a candidate CAR-T target but does not present clinical efficacy data or human trials.
A systematic narrative review of mechanistic literature on five deubiquitinases in cancer, proposing therapeutic targeting strategies without reporting clinical trial data or empirical evidence of efficacy.
In vitro mechanistic study in a single TNBC cell line suggesting synergy between two agents, lacking any in vivo validation, patient data, or clinical trial evidence to support therapeutic application.
A narrative review synthesizing preclinical mechanistic evidence on VHL targets and proposing therapeutic modalities, lacking clinical trial data or human evidence to support practice recommendations.
A comprehensive review summarizing molecular principles, clinical progress, and translational strategies for targeted protein degradation in cancer immunotherapy, rather than reporting original experimental data or trial results.
This is an exploratory computational study using machine learning to predict HDAC3 inhibition by FDA-approved drugs, without experimental validation or clinical data, raising mechanistic questions rather than answering therapeutic ones.