Following this puts new work involving it at the top of your briefing, with a note saying why it is there. Links are taken from the source record, never inferred.
A preregistered audit of measurement reliability in LLM-based evaluation systems, demonstrating systematic failure to meet validity thresholds; methodologically sound but non-peer-reviewed, addressing instrumental rather than clinical validity.
This is a narrative review synthesizing mechanistic and preclinical evidence on plant extracts and androgen regulation; it identifies research directions rather than reporting new empirical findings or clinical outcomes.
This is a methods development study with an observational application in a single cohort; the analytical validation is sound, but the epidemiological findings are exploratory associations without a comparator or causal design.