Following this puts new work involving it at the top of your briefing, with a note saying why it is there. Links are taken from the source record, never inferred.
Small retrospective cohort (8 CNS cases) from a single institution over 30 years, identifying a rare phenotype with poor outcomes but explicitly cautioning that findings should be interpreted with caution due to small numbers and historical case clustering.
A narrative review synthesizing epidemiology, diagnostics, and management of emerging fungal pathogens in Asia without reporting original trial data or new clinical outcomes.
Descriptive epidemiological survey with geostatistical mapping in a single region; identifies prevalence and risk factors but lacks a comparator group, control arm, or analytical design to establish causation.
A narrative review synthesizing molecular pathogenesis, epidemiology, and treatment strategies for fungal esophagitis, offering expert perspective on emerging resistance and novel agents without reporting primary clinical trial data.
Single case report describing management and clinical course of an uncommon opportunistic infection in a juvenile lupus patient; provides no comparative data or outcome metrics beyond descriptive resolution.
Descriptive, uncontrolled sample collection with culture isolation findings; no comparative design, treatment protocol, or clinical outcomes reported; raises epidemiological questions about fungal abortion in dogs without intervention or validation.
A case series reporting two distinct clinical presentations of a rare fungal pathogen, expanding the known spectrum but lacking comparison, control, or quantified outcomes.
This is a narrative review synthesizing epidemiological and clinical observations about Candida infections without presenting primary research data, controlled comparisons, or quantified effect sizes.