Following this puts new work involving it at the top of your briefing, with a note saying why it is there. Links are taken from the source record, never inferred.
This is a modelling and mapping study that develops a novel framework for integrating tick hazard, exposure, and vulnerability; it describes global patterns but does not test efficacy of an intervention or validate predictions against clinical outcomes.
A narrative review synthesizing epidemiology, transmission dynamics, and public health challenges across a region, offering integrated surveillance recommendations within a One Health framework rather than reporting new empirical evidence.
A scoping review synthesizing surveillance data, published literature, and archival records to characterize an emerging infectious disease threat; descriptive and integrative rather than hypothesis-testing, with no comparative trial or meta-analytic effect size.
A narrative review synthesizing existing evidence to propose a framework for future vaccine development, raising questions about broadly protective hantavirus vaccines rather than reporting new empirical results.
A narrative review summarizing current knowledge of RVFV epidemiology, infection control, and vaccine development, identifying research gaps and calling for coordinated One Health approaches rather than reporting original empirical data.
A rigorous multilevel observational study with large sample and mixed-effects models that confirms known epidemiological patterns of HCPS and identifies forest fire activity as a novel ecological risk factor, but does not test an intervention or establish causation.
An exploratory machine learning analysis of surveillance data using unsupervised methods to identify epidemiological profiles; methodologically sound for its class but lacks clinical validation, prospective application, or outcome prediction.
A descriptive genomic and phylogenetic analysis of 23 viral sequences over 58 years with no clinical outcomes, comparators, or interventional data; establishes epidemiological landscape and evolutionary patterns but does not test a hypothesis or measure clinical impact.