Following this puts new work involving it at the top of your briefing, with a note saying why it is there. Links are taken from the source record, never inferred.
A narrative review proposing conceptual frameworks and research gaps rather than presenting empirical findings; raises questions about heat, menstruation, and mental health without reporting original data or synthesizing quantitative evidence.
Single-center retrospective study with clear associations between elevated homocysteine and renal pathology in IgAN, but modest discriminative ability (AUC 0.756) and attenuation after adjustment for renal function limit clinical utility.
A well-designed secondary analysis of an RCT showing that centralized troponin review identifies clinically meaningful recurrent MI with prognostic significance, but limited by single-trial population and surrogate endpoint focus.
Retrospective eligibility analysis demonstrating that 70–85% of biomarker-confirmed atypical AD patients would be ineligible for anti-amyloid therapies, primarily due to cognitive thresholds misaligned with disease severity.
A large retrospective cohort study identifying novel proteomic markers associated with dementia risk in comorbid T2DM and MDD, with clear statistical associations but requiring prospective validation and mechanistic confirmation.
Post hoc exploratory subanalysis of a parent RCT using a calculated variable (estimated total blood volume) to interrogate heterogeneity in a biomarker endpoint; the authors explicitly state findings are hypothesis-generating and require external validation.
Twin study establishing heritability and genetic correlations among Alzheimer's plasma biomarkers in a cognitively normal cohort, providing mechanistic insight but using surrogate biomarkers rather than clinical outcomes.