Loading
Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research · Journal article
Hawai‘i Journal of Health & Social Welfare · September 3, 2026
Early or partial results. Treat as a signal, not a conclusion.
This is a secondary analysis of a 2023 mixed-methods evaluation of a Pacific Field Epidemiology Training Program (SHIP) that identified stakeholder-reported satisfaction, frequent skill application, and perceived improvements in epidemiologic competencies. The findings are based on retrospective self-assessed proficiency ratings and qualitative themes, not objective measures, and lack a comparator group, limiting causal claims about training effectiveness.
Mixed-methods secondary analysis of 2023 external program evaluation. Stakeholders of the Strengthening Health Interventions in the Pacific (SHIP) Field Epidemiology Training Program in the United States-Affiliated Pacific Islands.. Intervention: Strengthening Health Interventions in the Pacific (SHIP) Field Epidemiology Training Program, a workplace-based epidemiology training program with academic accreditation. United States-Affiliated Pacific Islands.
Survey respondents (n=83) reported high satisfaction with the program and frequent application of SHIP-acquired skills in routine public health practice and outbreak response Significant improvements in retrospective self-assessed proficiency across all competencies (P<.001) Qualitative analysis of 52 key informant interviews and open-ended survey responses identified 6 themes grouped within 2 domains: the SHIP learning model and participant skills development and application
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
While the findings suggest perceived value and practical application of FETP training in Pacific Island public health settings, the reliance on retrospective self-assessment limits confidence in actual competency gains. Program designers should interpret stakeholder feedback as supportive but seek objective measures (e.g., competency examinations, supervisor-rated performance, outbreak response outcomes) to validate training effectiveness.
A mixed-methods program evaluation using retrospective self-assessed proficiency ratings and stakeholder interviews, without objective outcome measures or a comparator group, providing descriptive evidence of perceived training value rather than definitive efficacy.
As stated by the source record.
Quoted from the source exactly as published.
While the findings suggest perceived value and practical application of FETP training in Pacific Island public health settings, the reliance on retrospective self-assessment limits confidence in actual competency gains. Program designers should interpret stakeholder feedback as supportive but seek objective measures (e.g., competency examinations, supervisor-rated performance, outbreak response outcomes) to validate training effectiveness.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
The Pacific Island Health Officers Association supports health workforce capacity building in the United States-Affiliated Pacific Islands by implementing a Field Epidemiology Training Program (FETP) called Strengthening Health Interventions in the Pacific (SHIP).This study presents a secondary analysis of survey and interview data from a 2023 mixed-methods external evaluation to identify and examine stakeholder perspectives on the program.Quantitative survey data from 83 respondents were analyzed using descriptive statistics, with Wilcoxon signed-rank tests used to compare retrospective self-assessed proficiency ratings.Qualitative data from 52 key informant interviews and open-ended survey responses were analyzed using thematic coding.Analysis identified 6 themes grouped within 2 domains: the SHIP learning model and participant skills development and application.Stakeholders identified workplace-based learning, academic accreditation, inclusion of non-communicable disease epidemiology, and support from supervisors and instructors as important features of the learning model.Survey respondents reported high satisfaction with the program, frequent application of SHIP-acquired skills in routine public health practice and outbreak response, and significant improvements in retrospective self-assessed proficiency across all competencies (P<.001).Because competency ratings were retrospective self-assessments, the findings reflect perceived rather than objectively measured improvements in proficiency.Nevertheless, the consistency of the quantitative and qualitative findings suggests that FETPs may benefit from aligning training with workplace responsibilities, incorporating local disease priorities into the curriculum, providing recognized academic accreditation, and investing in strong instructional and supervisory support.The model may offer lessons for strengthening epidemiology capacity in small island jurisdictions and other resource-constrained public health settings.
Taken from the source record, never inferred. Follow any of these and new work involving them reaches your briefing.