Loading
Measuring dynamic central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) at baseline and after / Sepsis and Septic Shock · Observational Study
ClinicalTrials.gov · August 18, 2026
Early or partial results. Treat as a signal, not a conclusion.
This is a prospective observational diagnostic accuracy study, not yet recruiting, designed to evaluate whether changes in dynamic central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) can predict fluid responsiveness in septic shock. No results are posted in this registry record, and the study remains in planning phase.
Observational. Sepsis and Septic Shock; age from 18 Years. Intervention: Measuring dynamic central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) at baseline and afte…. Compared with: Cardiac output change measured by echocardiography (VTI) and cardiometry as reference standards for fluid responsiveness. n = 115. 1 site: Egypt.
This is a prospective observational diagnostic accuracy study, not yet recruiting, designed to evaluate whether changes in dynamic central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) can predict fluid responsiveness in septic shock. No results are posted in this registry record, and the study remains in planning phase.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
Once results are available, this study may clarify the utility of dynamic ScvO2 as a bedside predictor of fluid responsiveness in septic shock, potentially informing resuscitation strategy. Clinicians should await publication of results before considering use.
A prospective observational diagnostic accuracy study not yet recruiting, with no posted results; design and population are appropriate but the registry record alone cannot convey outcome data or evidentiary weight.
As stated by the source record.
Quoted from the source exactly as published.
Once results are available, this study may clarify the utility of dynamic ScvO2 as a bedside predictor of fluid responsiveness in septic shock, potentially informing resuscitation strategy. Clinicians should await publication of results before considering use.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
What is missing. This record has no key findings. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Registry record from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07516236). This is a study registration, not published results. Lead sponsor: Menoufia University. Recruitment status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING. Study type: OBSERVATIONAL. Enrollment: 115 participants (ESTIMATED). Conditions: Sepsis and Septic Shock. Interventions: DEVICE: Measuring dynamic central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) at baseline and after fluid challenge. Measuring Cardiac output by echocardiography or cardiometry at baseline and after fluid challenge.. Primary outcome measures: Measuring dynamic central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) at baseline and after fluid challenge. , After 30 mins. Brief summary: This prospective observational diagnostic accuracy study investigates the efficacy of dynamic central venous oxygen saturation in predicting fluid responsiveness in septic shock, compared to measurements obtained using echocardiography (VTI) and cardiometry. We will correlate the changes in measuring cardiac output by both echocardiography and cardiometry with the changes in dynamic central venous oxygen saturation both at baseline and after fluid challenge to investigate the efficacy of dynamic central venous oxygen saturation in predicting fluid responsiveness in septic shock.
Taken from the source record, never inferred. Follow any of these and new work involving them reaches your briefing.