Loading
Obese Patients / Bilateral EOIB + fentanyl 1 μg/kg loading + normal saline loading (equivalent vo / We hypothesize that adding a perioperative lidocaine infusion (1.5 mg/kg loading · Interventional Study
ClinicalTrials.gov · September 9, 2026
Early or partial results. Treat as a signal, not a conclusion.
This is a registered but unreported interventional trial comparing bilateral external oblique intercostal block with concurrent intravenous lidocaine infusion versus block with saline in obese patients undergoing gastric bypass. No results are currently available in this registry record, so no efficacy or safety conclusions can be drawn.
Interventional, Randomized, Parallel, Triple masking, Treatment purpose. Obese Patients; age from 18 Years; to 60 Years. Intervention: Group L (lidocaine). Compared with: Group P (placebo) — Placebo Comparator. n = 100. 1 site: Egypt.
This is a registered but unreported interventional trial comparing bilateral external oblique intercostal block with concurrent intravenous lidocaine infusion versus block with saline in obese patients undergoing gastric bypass. No results are currently available in this registry record, so no efficacy or safety conclusions can be drawn.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
This trial may inform opioid-sparing analgesia strategies in bariatric surgery if results demonstrate reduced intraoperative fentanyl consumption without safety concerns. Clinicians should await final results before considering any practice change.
This is an active registry record for a planned interventional study with no results posted; enrollment is ongoing and no outcome data are available for assessment.
As stated by the source record.
Quoted from the source exactly as published.
This trial may inform opioid-sparing analgesia strategies in bariatric surgery if results demonstrate reduced intraoperative fentanyl consumption without safety concerns. Clinicians should await final results before considering any practice change.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
What is missing. This record has no key findings. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Registry record from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07809425). This is a study registration, not published results. Lead sponsor: Menoufia University. Recruitment status: RECRUITING. Phase: NA. Study type: INTERVENTIONAL. Enrollment: 100 participants (ESTIMATED). Conditions: Obese Patients. Interventions: DRUG: We hypothesize that adding a perioperative lidocaine infusion (1.5 mg/kg loading + 1.5 mg/kg/h) to bilateral EOIB and low dose fentanyl loading reduces intraoperative fentanyl consumption.; OTHER: Bilateral EOIB + fentanyl 1 μg/kg loading + normal saline loading (equivalent volume) + normal saline infusion (equivalent rate).. Primary outcome measures: Total intraoperative fentanyl consumption , Intraoperative time, during surgery. Brief summary: Adding a perioperative lidocaine infusion (1.5 mg/kg loading + 1.5 mg/kg/h) to bilateral EOIB and low dose fentanyl loading reduces intraoperative fentanyl consumption (ANI guided rescue) compared to placebo, without increasing adverse events.
Taken from the source record, never inferred. Follow any of these and new work involving them reaches your briefing.