Loading
Visit 2 / Visit 1 / Normal Weight Adults · Interventional Study
ClinicalTrials.gov · August 7, 2026
Early or partial results. Treat as a signal, not a conclusion.
This is a registry record for a terminated validation study of a French translation of the Leeds Food Preference Questionnaire in normal-weight and obese adults. No results have been posted in this registry record, and the study's completion status and any findings remain unreported.
Interventional, Randomized, Single Group, Open label, Treatment purpose. Normal Weight Adults, Adults With Obesity; age from 20 Years; to 55 Years; accepts healthy volunteers. Intervention: NW (Normal Weight); OBESE. n = 37. 1 site: France.
This is a registry record for a terminated validation study of a French translation of the Leeds Food Preference Questionnaire in normal-weight and obese adults. No results have been posted in this registry record, and the study's completion status and any findings remain unreported.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
If completed and results become available, this tool validation would provide French-language clinicians and researchers with a validated instrument to assess food reward, a recognised component of appetite control. Current registry record provides no evidence of efficacy or validation.
This is a terminated clinical trial registry record with no results posted; it describes a planned validation study of a measurement tool in a small sample, without outcome data.
As stated by the source record.
Quoted from the source exactly as published.
If completed and results become available, this tool validation would provide French-language clinicians and researchers with a validated instrument to assess food reward, a recognised component of appetite control. Current registry record provides no evidence of efficacy or validation.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
What is missing. This record has no key findings. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Registry record from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04041830). This is a study registration, not published results. Lead sponsor: University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand. Recruitment status: TERMINATED. Phase: NA. Study type: INTERVENTIONAL. Enrollment: 37 participants (ACTUAL). Conditions: Normal Weight Adults, Adults With Obesity. Interventions: BEHAVIORAL: Visit 1; BEHAVIORAL: Visit 2. Primary outcome measures: Change in Food reward , day 1 , day 8. Brief summary: While Food reward is an important component of the appetite control to consider, there is actually no tool that has been developed in French to perform its evaluation. The Leeds Food Preference Questionnaire (LFPQ) is a validated and recognized tool to assess food reward, being however developed for British populations. The aim of this work is to validate a French version of the LFPQ among lean and obese adults.
Taken from the source record, never inferred. Follow any of these and new work involving them reaches your briefing.