Anxiety / Addiction / Depression · Observational Study
ClinicalTrials.gov · September 10, 2026
Early or partial results. Treat as a signal, not a conclusion.
This is a planned remote observational study, not yet recruiting, designed to characterize how fluctuations in internal emotional states (measured via ecological momentary assessment over 12 weeks) influence decision-making across individuals with varying levels of depression, anxiety, and substance-related disorders. No results are currently available in this registry record.
Observational. Depression, Anxiety, Addiction, Emotion, Craving, Stress; age from 18 Years; to 55 Years. Intervention: Transdiagnostic Dimensional Cohort. n = 420. 1 site: United States.
This is a planned remote observational study, not yet recruiting, designed to characterize how fluctuations in internal emotional states (measured via ecological momentary assessment over 12 weeks) influence decision-making across individuals with varying levels of depression, anxiety, and substance-related disorders. No results are currently available in this registry record.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
This is a clinical trial registry record with no posted results; it describes a planned observational study of state-dependent decision-making across a psychopathology continuum using ecological momentary assessment, not yet recruiting.
As stated by the source record.
Quoted from the source exactly as published.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
What is missing. This record has no key findings. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Registry record from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07801079). This is a study registration, not published results. Lead sponsor: National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). Recruitment status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING. Study type: OBSERVATIONAL. Enrollment: 420 participants (ESTIMATED). Conditions: Depression, Anxiety, Addiction, Emotion, Craving, Stress. Primary outcome measures: To establish the relationship between psychiatric symptom severity and the reactivity of decision-making to changes in internal state. , Throughout the study, transdiagnostic measures of trait- and state-level symptom severity and clinical diagnosis determined by Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders (SCID).; To identify how individual differences in metacognition might moderate the influence of internal states on decision-making. , In 12 weeks of EMA, measure of metacognition derived from questionnaires and confidence ratings in decision-making tasks.; To estimate the temporal profile of internal state; the lag between changes in internal state and measurable changes in decision-making and to assess whether different aspects of decision-makings are sensitive to acute versus sustained changes i... , In 12 weeks of EMA, self-report of internal states in different time scale and following significant life event.; To assess the influence of naturally occurring fluctuations in internal states on value-based decision-making. , In 12 weeks of EMA, self-report of internal states and significant life events as well as behaviors in established and novel cognitive-behavioral decision-making tasks.. Brief summary: Background: Making decisions during daily life is a complicated behavior. Even simple choices can be affected by a range of emotions, stresses, and moods. Mental health issues such as depression and anxiety can lead people to make decisions that have negative effects on their lives. Learning how changes in feeling affect a person's decisions may help researchers find ways to help them make more positive choices. Objective: To learn how changes in a person's feelings and emotions affect their decisions. Eligibility: People aged 18 to 55 years who are healthy or who have some level of depressive, anxiety, substance-related, or addictive disorders. Design: All study activities can be done remotely; participants may use a smartphone app, a website, or telehealth. Participants will have a baseline visit. They will complete tasks that require decisions; these tasks are like games they play on their phone. They will also answer questions about their habits, how they feel, their sleep quality, and any problem behaviors. They may wear a smartwatch during the study; it will record data such as their movements and heart rate. For 12 weeks, a study app will prompt participants to respond. They will be asked to answer questions about how they are feeling, any problematic behaviors, or big life events; they will be asked to complete tasks that require making decisions. They may record a video or audio clip describing their day and how they feel. For 3 of the 12 weeks, participants will get prompts up to 6 times per day. For 9 weeks, they will get up to 3 prompts per day. They will have an end-of-study visit to discuss their experiences.
Taken from the source record, never inferred. Follow any of these and new work involving them reaches your briefing.