Following this puts new work involving it at the top of your briefing, with a note saying why it is there. Links are taken from the source record, never inferred.
A single-centre RCT with sound design (randomised, parallel-group) and statistically significant results on fatigue and functional outcomes in a moderately sized sample, but lacking hard clinical endpoints and with open design that limits generalisability.
A scoping review mapping the landscape of non-pharmacological interventions without quality assessment, effect synthesis, or meta-analysis; descriptive and gap-identifying rather than outcome-determining.
This is a protocol paper for an ongoing Phase II trial with no results reported; it describes planned methodology and endpoints only, representing preliminary evidence generation in progress.
Observational longitudinal cohort study with descriptive findings that attenuate to non-significance after adjustment; exploratory subgroup analyses and acknowledged selection bias limit inference about age-related quality-of-life decline.
Single case report describing nutritional intervention application in a complex cancer patient; demonstrates feasibility and clinical reasoning but lacks comparator, control group, and quantified outcome measures.
This is a professional guideline developed by the China Anti-Cancer Association to standardize cancer pain assessment, diagnosis, and multimodal management across the disease trajectory.
A small quasi-experimental trial with non-random allocation showing salt–soda–bicarbonate mouthwash superior to routine care and benzydamine for oral mucositis reduction over 5 days, but limited by design, sample size, short follow-up, and lack of blinding.
Pilot study comparing 20 MI-intervention patients to 36 historical controls with no randomization; primary endpoint (adherence) shows promising trend but secondary outcomes lack statistical significance, requiring larger RCT confirmation.