Following this puts new work involving it at the top of your briefing, with a note saying why it is there. Links are taken from the source record, never inferred.
Large national cohort study with hard clinical outcome (overall survival) showing inferior outcomes with dose de-escalation, aligning with recent randomized evidence and supporting current standard-of-care dosing.
Rigorous population-based retrospective cohort study with multivariable adjustment comparing four treatment strategies in localized oral cavity cancer, demonstrating significantly improved survival with elective neck dissection versus omission or radiotherapy alone.
Single-institution prospective cohort with uniform treatment identifying prognostic factors for disease-free survival in oral cavity cancer, but lacks a comparator group and generalizability is limited to one centre.
A small randomized controlled trial with a statistically significant primary endpoint (p=0.0008) and reported improvements in swallowing, voice, and GRBAS scores, but limited by modest sample size, lack of reported effect sizes, and insufficient detail on methods and follow-up.
Post hoc analysis of a phase II trial with small sample (n=29) and surrogate/exploratory endpoints; findings are hypothesis-generating and require validation in larger populations.
Single-center cohort of six patients from a prematurely terminated phase 2 trial with descriptive analysis only; feasibility and immune remodeling demonstrated but efficacy and safety conclusions explicitly limited by sample size and trial discontinuation.
This is a protocol paper for an ongoing Phase II trial with no results reported; it describes planned methodology and endpoints only, representing preliminary evidence generation in progress.
Single-centre pilot feasibility study with uncontrolled design and surrogate endpoints (molecular detection); demonstrates technical capability and epidemiological associations but lacks comparative evidence or clinical outcome data needed to guide practice.