Following this puts new work involving it at the top of your briefing, with a note saying why it is there. Links are taken from the source record, never inferred.
A phase III RCT with adequate design and sample size reporting survival and QoL benefits for homeopathy, but the original publication was retracted by the journal in November 2025 after corrections, with majority co-author disagreement, creating fundamental uncertainty about the reliability and interpretation of these findings.
A narrative review mapping educational infrastructure and proposing priorities for integrative oncology workforce development, informing professional practice and curriculum planning rather than testing a clinical hypothesis.
International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews
A narrative review proposing a conceptual framework for integrating community medicine and homoeopathic materia medica in NCD care; no empirical evidence, clinical outcomes, or comparative effectiveness data are presented.
A descriptive analysis of published trial citations in three major guidelines, identifying a geographic and economic disparity in the evidence base for CINV antiemetics, but without direct clinical outcome data or intervention testing.
A prospective observational cohort study identifying barriers to acupuncture completion in cancer patients; lacks a control arm, reports surrogate endpoints (patient-reported outcomes), and is descriptive rather than interventional, making it hypothesis-generating for health equity rather than practice-changing.
A small qualitative study from a single urban Māori health provider that explores perspectives on antibiotic guideline use; generates themes for future implementation but does not evaluate clinical outcomes or guideline effectiveness.
This is a narrative review article proposing a conceptual framework linking gut-brain interaction, psychosocial factors, and homeopathic treatment in pediatric constipation, without new empirical data or clinical trial evidence.