Following this puts new work involving it at the top of your briefing, with a note saying why it is there. Links are taken from the source record, never inferred.
Rigorous two-sample Mendelian randomization with meta-analyzed summary statistics from large cohorts (UK Biobank and FinnGen), clear causal estimates for primary exposures, adequate instrument strength, and sensitivity analyses supporting robustness, though effect sizes are modest.
Single case report with probable (not definitive) diagnosis due to technical limitations in CSF testing; illustrates a clinical presentation and treatment response but cannot establish efficacy or causation.
A systematic review of case reports and small case series with no comparative data, incidence estimates, or controlled outcomes—describes a rare adverse event but cannot quantify risk or establish causality rigorously.
A descriptive epidemiological analysis using secondary data from a global registry with projections to 2060, reporting trends and forecasts rather than testing an intervention or causal hypothesis, making it hypothesis-generating rather than confirmatory evidence.