Life sciences · Phase 2 Trial
ClinicalTrials.gov · October 21, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Phase 2 Trial.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Registry record from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07741344). This is a study registration, not published results. Lead sponsor: Chinese University of Hong Kong. Recruitment status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING. Phase: PHASE2. Study type: INTERVENTIONAL. Enrollment: 292 participants (ESTIMATED). Conditions: Stage IA NSCLC. Interventions: PROCEDURE: Bronchoscopic Microwave Ablation; PROCEDURE: Surgical Resection. Primary outcome measures: Disease-Free Survival (DFS) at 24 Months , Up to 24 months after treatment. Brief summary: This study aims to address the core deficiencies in the field by situating bronchoscopic ablation within the same evidentiary frame as segmentectomy and lobectomy. It will deliver adjusted retrospective comparisons with external validation using population data, a prospective noninferiority evaluation on disease control and safety, quantitative evidence on pulmonary function and quality of life, and translational endpoints linking circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) dynamics and immune activation to durability of control. The work is directly aligned with Hong Kong service needs, where a safe lung preserving option that shortens recovery and optimises resource use could relieve surgical waiting pressure while maintaining oncologic outcomes.