Loading
Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · September 18, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Surface electromyography (sEMG)-based silent speech interfaces are limited by cross-user variability and calibration burden. We study a limited-data setting in which each of 27 speech-typical participants contributed less than 0.5 h of data (21.3 min on average) across Aloud and Mimed speech. Within a closed 50-sentence corpus, we used leave-one-subject-out evaluation, initializing from a released single-subject checkpoint, pretraining on non-held-out participants, and fine-tuning on the target participant. This pipeline achieved 21.7% character error rate (CER) and 31.9% word error rate (WER), compared with 49.3% CER without target-subject calibration and 68.0% CER for direct checkpoint fine-tuning. Multi-subject pretraining from random initialization followed by fine-tuning reached 44.9% CER and did not converge under the fixed schedule in 5 of 27 folds, indicating substantial optimization and accuracy benefits from checkpoint initialization. Macro-averaged CER declined from 74.4% with one pretraining participant to 21.7% with 26. Three minutes of target-subject calibration achieved 20.5% CER and 31.7% WER, with no statistically significant difference from the full approximately 13-min pool (21.7% CER and 31.9% WER). A subject-specific adapter provided no detectable benefit. Excluding the five evaluation sentences from all sEMG model-training data increased CER and WER to 78.6% and 99.9%. These results support short-calibration personalization in a standardized-montage, closed-corpus setting.