Cognition Disorders / Cognition Other / Voice-based Cognitive Testing · Observational Study
ClinicalTrials.gov · August 13, 2026
Early or partial results. Treat as a signal, not a conclusion.
This is a planned observational study to establish normative reference values for a voice-enabled digital cognitive assessment battery in healthy adults aged 18–100 years. No results are yet available in this registry record; the study is currently recruiting and aims to generate age-, sex-, and education-adjusted norms to support standardized interpretation of future assessments.
Observational. Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Cognition - Other, Dementia, Alzheimer Disease, Memory, Neurocognition; age from 18 Years; to 100 Years; accepts healthy volunteers. Intervention: Ages 18-29; Ages 30-39; Ages 40-49; Ages 50-59; Ages 60-69; Ages 70-79; Ages 80-89; Ages 90-100. n = 1,000. 1 site: United States.
This is a planned observational study to establish normative reference values for a voice-enabled digital cognitive assessment battery in healthy adults aged 18–100 years. No results are yet available in this registry record; the study is currently recruiting and aims to generate age-, sex-, and education-adjusted norms to support standardized interpretation of future assessments.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
Clinicians should not yet use this resource: the study is recruiting and has not posted results. When complete, normative reference values will support interpretation of digital cognitive assessments in clinical and research settings, but validation against established neuropsychological instruments is not described in this registry record.
This is a registry record for an ongoing observational study with no results posted; it describes planned normative data collection without yet delivering the reference values or validation data needed for clinical use.
As stated by the source record.
Quoted from the source exactly as published.
Clinicians should not yet use this resource: the study is recruiting and has not posted results. When complete, normative reference values will support interpretation of digital cognitive assessments in clinical and research settings, but validation against established neuropsychological instruments is not described in this registry record.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
What is missing. This record has no key findings. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Registry record from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07763392). This is a study registration, not published results. Lead sponsor: The Neurology Center of Southern California. Recruitment status: RECRUITING. Study type: OBSERVATIONAL. Enrollment: 1000 participants (ESTIMATED). Conditions: Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Cognition - Other, Dementia, Alzheimer Disease, Memory, Neurocognition. Interventions: DIAGNOSTIC_TEST: Voice-based Cognitive Testing. Primary outcome measures: Development of normative reference values , 30 minutes. Brief summary: Participants enrolled in this study will complete a single-session, non-invasive, computerized cognitive assessment administered through a secure, web-based digital platform. The purpose of the study is to establish normative cognitive performance data from healthy adults aged 18-100 years and develop age-, sex-, and education-adjusted reference values for the digital assessment platform. This is an observational study and does not involve any therapeutic intervention, investigational treatment, or alteration of routine medical care. Following electronic informed consent, participants will complete a standardized screening questionnaire to determine eligibility. The questionnaire collects demographic information, education, English language proficiency, medical and neurological history, psychiatric history, medication use, substance use, sleep history, and self-reported cognitive concerns. Standardized mood screening instruments (PHQ-9 and GAD-7) are also administered. Individuals meeting predefined exclusion criteria that could significantly influence cognitive performance will not be included in the normative dataset. Eligible participants will then complete a digital cognitive assessment battery using standardized visual and auditory instructions. The platform utilizes automated voice-recognition technology to capture spoken responses and standardized algorithms to score performance, eliminating the need for examiner scoring and ensuring consistent administration across participants. Total study participation, including consent, screening, and testing, is approximately 30 to 45 minutes. The cognitive battery evaluates multiple cognitive domains commonly assessed during neuropsychological examinations. Language abilities are assessed through phonemic and semantic verbal fluency tasks, measuring the ability to rapidly generate words within specified categories. Confrontation naming is evaluated using digitally presented images that participants identify verbally. Learning and memory are assessed through immediate and delayed verbal recall tasks, including recognition memory measures. Attention and working memory are evaluated using forward and backward digit span tasks. Executive functioning and attention are further assessed using a brief computerized problem-solving task. Equivalent alternate versions of selected tasks may be administered to minimize practice effects while measuring the same cognitive domains. All assessments are brief, non-invasive, and completed using spoken responses. The platform automatically records participant responses, response timing, and scoring metrics. Voice recordings are collected solely to support automated scoring and quality assurance. All electronic data are transmitted using encrypted connections and stored within HIPAA-aligned cloud infrastructure. Personally identifiable information is stored separately from cognitive performance data using unique study identification numbers, and only authorized study personnel have access to identifiable information. De-identified data will be used to generate normative reference values. A subset of approximately 100 participants may be invited to complete a second assessment 2-4 weeks after the initial visit to evaluate test-retest reliability. Participation in this follow-up assessment is voluntary. Participants will not receive diagnostic results or individualized interpretations of their performance because the study is intended solely to establish normative reference data. If responses on the PHQ-9 suggest potential acute self-harm risk, the platform will provide crisis resources and notify the study team in accordance with the study safety procedures. The primary outcome of the study is the development of age-, sex-, and education-adjusted normative reference values for the digital cognitive assessment platform, supporting standardized interpretation of future assessments in clinical and research settings.
Taken from the source record, never inferred. Follow any of these and new work involving them reaches your briefing.