Loading
Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · October 23, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Contrastive learning has emerged as a popular paradigm for training representation models. While prior studies pursue more practical and less restrictive assumptions to enhance theoretical understanding of contrastive learning, they essentially describe the interconnections among representations within the data or induced by the function class. To encapsulate these assumptions, we propose the measure of internal discrepancy that quantifies the difference between the mean representation of positive samples and latent cluster centers. We then prove an internal discrepancy-aware generalization bound for downstream supervised tasks following contrastive learning, without requiring additional assumptions. This generalization bound not only serves as a unifying framework connecting various assumptions but also motivates us to further reduce the internal discrepancy, thereby introducing the relaxed k-means loss as an approximation. Moreover, we investigate the downstream behaviors of contrastive learning from the perspective of contrastive learning-incurred supervised losses. In the presence of class imbalance, we shed light on why contrastive learning can facilitate imbalanced learning. Finally, we investigate the optimality of these incurred supervised losses, proving several intriguing properties.