Loading
Life sciences · Observational Study
ClinicalTrials.gov · October 29, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Observational Study.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Registry record from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07185958). This is a study registration, not published results. Lead sponsor: Aalborg University Hospital. Recruitment status: RECRUITING. Study type: OBSERVATIONAL. Enrollment: 80 participants (ESTIMATED). Conditions: Brain Metastases, Bone Metastases, Head and Neck Cancer, Lung Cancer. Interventions: DIAGNOSTIC_TEST: Dual-energy CT (DECT); DRUG: Iodine-based contrast agent; DIAGNOSTIC_TEST: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI); DRUG: Gadolinium-based contrast agent. Primary outcome measures: Inter-observer variability (geometric differences in volume and surface) of manual tumor and OAR delineations on DECT compared with SECT/MRI. , Baseline (time of imaging before radiotherapy planning). Brief summary: The primary aim of this clinical study, 'Dual Energy CT - a tool for delineation of tumor and organs at risk in radiotherapy' (DART) is to evaluate whether dual-energy CT (DECT) is at least as effective as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in delineating both tumors and organs at risk (OARs) in patients referred for radiotherapy (RT). This primary aim will be explored in patient groups where the performance of DECT for RT has been described in the literature (but mostly based on signal-to-noise ratio and/or contrast-to-noise ratio), such as brain metastases (sub-cohort 'DART Brain') and head and neck cancer (sub-cohort 'DART H\&N'). Additionally, DART will explore diagnoses not yet studied in the literature, such as bone metastases (sub-cohort 'DART Bone'). If DECT could be demonstrated to achieve delineations for RT in both tumors and OARs that are equally accurate as those based on MRI, it could offer significant advantages by being faster and more cost-effective, making DECT a valuable alternative to MRI in clinical practice. As a secondary aim, the study will evaluate whether DART offers benefits when added to standard RT imaging for tumor and OAR delineation: (1) For lung cancer patients (sub-cohort 'DART Lung'), where MRI scans are typically not valuable due to tumor motion caused by breathing, 'DART Lung' will assess whether DECT performed in breath-hold provides added value compared to the single-energy CT (SECT) scan conducted during free breathing, as used in current clinical practice. (2) For head and neck cancer patients, 'DART H\&N' will evaluate whether DECT offers added value compared to the positron emission tomography (PET)/CT scan currently used in clinical practice.