Loading
Life sciences · Observational Study
ClinicalTrials.gov · October 28, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Observational Study.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Registry record from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07395700). This is a study registration, not published results. Lead sponsor: Lauro Gutiérrez Castro. Recruitment status: COMPLETED. Study type: OBSERVATIONAL. Enrollment: 289 participants (ACTUAL). Conditions: Substance Use Disorders, Mental Health Disorders, Substance-related Disorders, Depression Scale Score, Validation Study. Primary outcome measures: Psychometric Validity of the Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale (BADS) , Single cross-sectional assessment conducted at the time of psychological evaluation during residential treatment.. Brief summary: This cross-sectional observational study evaluates the psychometric properties, structural validity, item response characteristics, and concurrent criterion validity of the Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale (BADS) in adults receiving clinical treatment for substance use disorders (SUD). The study examines the scale's dimensional structure, reliability, and association with environmental reward (Environmental Reward Observation Scale, EROS) in a primary clinical cohort of 289 participants. Concurrent and discriminant validity analyses with additional clinical measures (assessing borderline symptom severity, impulsivity, anxiety, and anger expression) were evaluated in a verified sequential subcohort of 59 participants with fully confirmed individual-level linkage across multi-scale administration sheets. This retrospective study record documents the completed psychometric evaluation conducted within a specialized residential therapeutic community.