Loading
Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · October 26, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Exploration in physical control environments requires agents to identify actions whose consequences reveal previously unexplored aspects of the underlying dynamics. However, many intrinsic motivation methods rely on immediate prediction errors, state novelty, or local physical changes, which may overlook informative outcomes that emerge across extended temporal horizons. We investigate whether learning structured representations of reachable futures can provide a more effective basis for exploration. To this end, we introduce Hamiltonian Temporal Contrastive Curiosity (HTC$^2$), a framework that combines multi-horizon temporal representation learning with Hamiltonian phase-space structure. A horizon-conditioned contrastive critic learns temporal relationships from future-state pairs sampled within the same episode. The distance between positive-pair representations is then used as an intrinsic reward, encouraging the agent to explore futures that remain insufficiently organized in the learned representation. To incorporate information about physical dynamics, we additionally modulate this reward using bounded multi-step Hamiltonian variation, rather than directly rewarding changes in the Hamiltonian itself. We integrate HTC$^2$ with both Soft Actor-Critic (SAC) and Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), and evaluate it across six DeepMind Control Suite tasks. Comparisons with ICM, RIDE, E3B, Plan2Explore, and a single-step Hamiltonian curiosity baseline are complemented by state-coverage evaluations, component ablations, and phase-space diagnostics to characterize the contributions of temporal learning and physical structure to exploratory behavior.