Life sciences · Journal article
The Guthrie Clinic Journal of Medicine · September 25, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Abstract Background: Patients undergoing breast cancer treatment experience financial toxicity that can lead to stress and affect access to care. This study investigates the financial toxicity patients with breast cancer face. Methods: Change in level of self-reported financial toxicity was evaluated by determining the difference with the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity–Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (COST-FACIT). The survey was administered at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months to patients undergoing treatment within a rural cancer center to understand patterns with financial toxicity. A higher score indicated less financial toxicity. Health insurance literacy data (at baseline and 1 year) and support services data (at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months) were also collected through survey distribution. Demographic data were also collected. Results: Among 102 patients, COST-FACIT scores significantly increased over the course of the year ( P < 0.001) and combined scores were significantly higher for patients at or above the age of 65 years ( P = 0.001). There was no statistical difference between insurance type (private or public) or between the stages of breast cancer. Interrelationship analysis showed a negative correlation between COST-FACIT score and support service utilization, but not with health insurance literacy. Discussion: COST-FACIT scores were higher with treatment over time and if the patient was 65 years of age or over. Additional financial support may be beneficial to patients early on in their cancer treatment, as well as patients under the age of 65 years, although further work is needed.