Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · October 27, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Diffusion models have revolutionized the generation of realistic artificial images. Efficient techniques such as Low Rank Adaptation (LoRA) can modify these models for particular use cases, making them more diverse and widely usable. At the same time, open base models may be adapted to deliver biased, harmful or illegal images in an online service. In this paper, we develop a protocol to detect when a service may be using an adaptation of an otherwise standard model. We describe the precise setup and threat model for this provenance question and define two different problems arising due the presence of multiple model families and multiple adaptations. In contrast to previous works that have considered model identification within lists of known candidate models, we consider the realistic open world scenario where the set of possible adaptations and alternative models are unknown. Using a hypothesis testing approach, our protocols can distinguish between the base model, a LoRA adaptation and other completely different families of models. For this test, we develop a black box signature of the models based only on intrinsic dimension of sets of images generated by the models.