Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · September 16, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Leaf counting is an important task in plant phenotyping for monitoring plant growth and estimating crop yield. Most existing methods rely on RGB images, but their performance is often affected by occlusion, lighting variations, and other real-world challenges. Additional modalities, such as depth and thermal images, can provide useful complementary information. However, multimodal leaf counting remains underexplored. Also, many existing methods assume that all training data are available simultaneously, which is impractical in real agricultural settings, where data is collected over time from multiple sources. To address these challenges, we propose MCLC-NET, a multimodal continual learning framework for leaf counting. It learns tasks sequentially using a memory-based strategy with a memory buffer to retain important samples from previous tasks. We also introduce MMLC, a real-world multimodal leaf-counting dataset designed for a domain incremental scenario (DIS) in CL. It contains RGB, depth, and thermal images collected across different crop types under varying environmental conditions, arranged in three orderings: crop-wise, time-wise, and mixed. Experimental results, averaged over three random seeds, demonstrate that MCLC-NET consistently outperforms existing methods across all three task orderings, achieving the lowest AMSE of 0.675$\pm$0.027, 0.542$\pm$0.069, and 0.745$\pm$0.057, respectively.