Loading
Quality of Life / Adherence to the IF Protocol / Obese Adults · Interventional Study
ClinicalTrials.gov · September 4, 2026
Early or partial results. Treat as a signal, not a conclusion.
This is a completed but unpublished feasibility study registered on ClinicalTrials.gov that enrolled 32 obese working women to compare adherence and quality of life across three intermittent fasting protocols over 4 weeks. No results are posted in this registry record, and the study design, methods, and outcome data are not available for evaluation.
Interventional, Randomized, Single Group, Single masking, Health Services Research purpose. Obese Adults; Female; age from 25 Years; to 50 Years. Intervention: MADF; TRE; PF5:2. n = 32. 1 site: Malaysia.
This is a completed but unpublished feasibility study registered on ClinicalTrials.gov that enrolled 32 obese working women to compare adherence and quality of life across three intermittent fasting protocols over 4 weeks. No results are posted in this registry record, and the study design, methods, and outcome data are not available for evaluation.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
This is a completed registry record with no posted results; it describes a small, single-centre interventional study of feasibility and adherence to three intermittent fasting protocols in a narrow population, designed to inform future intervention selection rather than to test efficacy or clinical outcomes.
As stated by the source record.
Quoted from the source exactly as published.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
What is missing. This record has no key findings. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Registry record from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07804329). This is a study registration, not published results. Lead sponsor: Suriana Md Akir. Recruitment status: COMPLETED. Phase: NA. Study type: INTERVENTIONAL. Enrollment: 32 participants (ACTUAL). Conditions: Obese Adults. Interventions: OTHER: Adherence to the IF Protocol; OTHER: Quality of Life. Primary outcome measures: Adherence Percentage , Daly throughout 4 weeks of intervention. From Day 1 until Day 28. Brief summary: In these recent years, Intermittent Fasting (IF) has become popular among the public and health fraternities not only because it produced evidence-based results as an alternative dietary approach in weight loss strategy, but also putative for its practical implementation to link with daily routine. IF is defined as a range of dietary regimens involving fasting for an extended time period (16-48hrs) with little to no energy intake on fast day. However, there are many types of IF regiments with different methodological approaches, and results are inconsistent and debatable. Therefore, it has raised a question on which IF regimen design will possibly maximise the health benefit. Thus, the aim of this study is to identify IF regimens that are most feasible and acceptable to working women. The purpose of this study was to examine which type of IF regiment is more feasible for weight loss intervention programmes by prescribing three different types of IF to participants
Taken from the source record, never inferred. Follow any of these and new work involving them reaches your briefing.