Loading
Life sciences · Journal article
New England Journal of Medicine · September 12, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
BackgroundTambotatug pelitecan (known as Tam-Peli, a new antibody–drug conjugate that targets the immune-checkpoint molecule B7-H3) showed promising clinical efficacy in patients with relapsed extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer in early-phase trials. MethodsIn this phase 3, multicenter, open-label, randomized trial, we assigned eligible patients with small-cell lung cancer that had progressed after first-line platinum-based therapy in a 1:1 ratio to receive tambotatug pelitecan or topotecan. The primary end point was overall survival. The key secondary end points were progression-free survival and objective response as assessed by investigators. Here, we report the results from the prespecified interim analysis. ResultsA total of 451 patients underwent randomization: 225 were assigned to receive tambotatug pelitecan and 226 to receive topotecan. Overall survival was significantly longer with tambotatug pelitecan than with topotecan — a median of 13.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.1 to could not be estimated), as compared with 9.4 months (95% CI, 7.7 to 10.5); the stratified hazard ratio for death was 0.46 (95% CI, 0.35 to 0.62; P<0.001). Treatment with tambotatug pelitecan also resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival than treatment with topotecan (median, 7.4 months [95% CI, 6.1 to 7.6] vs. 2.8 months [95% CI, 1.8 to 3.0]; stratified hazard ratio, 0.29 [95% CI, 0.23 to 0.37]; P<0.001). A confirmed objective response occurred in 59.1% of the patients in the tambotatug pelitecan group, as compared with 9.7% of those in the topotecan group (P<0.001). The overall incidence of adverse events of grade 3 or higher was lower with tambotatug pelitecan than with topotecan (55.4% vs. 77.9%). ConclusionsAmong patients with relapsed small-cell lung cancer after platinum-based therapy, treatment with tambotatug pelitecan resulted in longer overall survival, longer progression-free survival, and a higher percentage of patients with an objective response than treatment with topotecan, with a lower incidence of adverse events of grade 3 or higher. (Funded by the Innovative Drug Research and Development National Science and Technology Major Project and MediLink Therapeutics; TAISHAN-302 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT06612151.)