Loading
Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · September 28, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Patient responses to dental pulp testing, ranging from no sensation to intense pain, provide important information for assessing pulp status in endodontic diagnosis. However, pain is a subjective sensory and emotional experience that varies considerably across individuals and can be difficult to communicate. We investigated whether complementary autonomic signals could support objective assessment of responses during dental examination. Forty-nine patients underwent cold pulp testing, yielding no-response, mild-response, and intense-response conditions. The framework integrated ECG-derived skin nerve activity (SKNA) and R-R intervals (RRI), together with electrodermal activity (EDA), using temporal convolutional network encoders with attention-based mid-level fusion. Individual baseline signals and subject-level covariates, including anxiety scores and biological sex, were also incorporated. The framework achieved 80.2% balanced accuracy, 75.2% sensitivity, and 85.2% specificity for binary classification of no response versus mild or intense response. For three-class classification, it achieved 60.0% balanced accuracy and a 58.8% macro-averaged F1 score. Ablation and attention-weight analyses indicated that EDA contributed most strongly to model performance, followed by RRI, while SKNA improved balanced accuracy by approximately five percentage points. Age was significantly associated with model performance. These findings support the feasibility of multimodal autonomic sensing for objective, non-invasive assessment of responses to dental pulp stimulation.