Loading
Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · September 18, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Adaptive optimization methods such as AdaGrad and Adam are widely used in modern neural-network training, but their adaptive scaling is primarily designed for vector-valued parameters and does not explicitly exploit matrix structure. Recent matrix-aware optimizers demonstrate the benefits of structured optimization, yet a general theoretical framework for deriving matrix-aware adaptivity comparable to that of AdaGrad remains lacking. In this work, we develop a general Online Mirror Descent framework with adaptive proximal functions for matrix-valued parameters, providing a principled approach to deriving matrix-aware adaptive optimization through online regret minimization. By introducing row-wise and column-wise matrix proximal functions and analyzing the resulting regret trade-off, we derive Row-wise Matrix AdaGrad (Row-AdaGrad) and Column-wise Matrix AdaGrad (Column-AdaGrad), with adaptive scaling determined by the accumulated row-wise or column-wise gradient norms. We establish regret guarantees and show that these matrix-aware bounds can be strictly tighter than those of entry-wise AdaGrad under structured gradients. Experiments on matrix factorization and deep neural-network training further demonstrate the benefits of aligning adaptive scaling with matrix structure, including improved optimization stability and trainability at larger learning rates and greater network depths.