Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · October 21, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
This paper describes an approach to constructing nowcast and forecast predictive models for the occurrence of high-latitude decameter ionospheric irregularities based on SuperDARN and SECIRA radar data and space weather parameters. The method relies on self-learning pattern recognition in the dynamics of space weather parameters, that influence the irregularities formation. The proposed approach is a data-driven, multiscale method in which the spatial distribution of irregularities is approximated using a neural network of an original architecture, inspired by graph neural networks. The model was trained and tested using data from 11 radars during the period 2010-2025 (SuperDARN: CVW, ICE, ICW, INV, PGR, PYK, RKN, SAS, STO; SECIRA: EKB, MAGW). It is shown that the model achieves optimal performance when using geomagnetic coordinates MLT,MLAT. The optimal set of parameters for the best nowcast and forecast over studied set of parameters is a combination of geomagnetic and solar disturbance indices ($a_{p}$, $K_{p}$, $AE$, F10.7) from ground-based observations, and satellite-measured solar wind and interplanetary magnetic field parameters ($P_{sw}$, $E_{sw}$, $\widetilde{B_{z}}$, $T_{sw}$). Hourly mean values for all the parameters were used in the analysis. The results indicate that acceptable forecast quality is achieved with a lead time of up to 7-9 hours, with the highest quality reached for nowcast (zero lead time). It is shown that the parameters $\widetilde{B_{z}}$ and F10.7 are significant for nowcasting only and can be neglected for other lead times. It is shown that $AE$ and $T_{sw}$ are significant for mid-term forecast (\textgreater 2hours ahead) and can be neglected for short-term predictions. Statistical relationships between the maximum latitude of the equatorial boundary of the irregularities and space weather parameters are also discussed.