Loading
Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · September 18, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Topology optimization (TO) represents a significant step towards automating the design process: given a working simulation, TO can produce a viable prototype at the press of a button by differentiating the simulation and iteratively improving the design. In practice, however, TO is riddled with ``magic numbers''---hyperparameters whose tuning significantly affects the outcome. Finding the right values typically requires not only deep problem-specific knowledge but also extensive trial-and-error. While practitioners can use surrogate-assisted hyperparameter optimization as an alternative, this approach requires strictly limiting the number of hyperparameters through careful problem formulation. Here, we propose differentiating TO itself using automatic differentiation. This yields ``hypergradients'' that allow us to tune these hyperparameters in tandem with the primary optimization. We show that evaluating just one or two steps of TO is sufficiently informative and that the method scales favorably to thousands of hyperparameters at an expense comparable to only a few standard TO runs. We demonstrate this approach on stress-constrained and compliance problems, with the latter utilizing a neural parameterization of the density field.