Loading
Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · October 29, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
We study the problem of fair ranking in recommender systems. We provide a formal probabilistic framework in which ranking policies are distributions over permutations, and the utility of a user is the exposure given to the items they interact with, relative to that of an ideal ranking. We consider utility parity across user groups, as well as its category-aware refinement, conditional utility parity, which requires parity within each category of items. Following a recent view of fairness as distributional stability, we show that both criteria are equivalent to the stability of the utility under changes in the composition of user groups. Optimizing over mixtures of ranking policies leads to a second-order cone program, for which we provide generalization bounds. A numerical study validates our theoretical findings.