Loading
Life sciences · Journal article
Microbiology Spectrum · September 14, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Mixed-genotype severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections are a concern due to the potential generation of novel recombinants that give rise to new variants. To better understand intra-host viral dynamics, we analyzed specimens from 24 participants from the U.S. Military Health System's Epidemiology, Immunology, and Clinical Characteristics of Emerging Infectious Diseases with Pandemic Potential COVID-19 cohort with suspected mixed-genotype SARS-CoV-2 infections. From an initial 24 suspected cases, we confirmed 17 as genuine coinfections and graded them by evidence: 7 were "strong"; 4 were "moderate"; 6 were "weak"; and 7 were deemed unlikely to be true mixed-genotype infections. Access to swabs from multiple body sites across the course of infection allowed us to observe compartmentalization and shifts in variant dominance that would have been missed by a single-timepoint analysis, as well as one recombinant Omicron BA.1/BA.2 genome. By using an evidence-based bioinformatic framework to assess sequencing data from well-characterized clinical cases, we distinguished genuine coinfections from bioinformatic artifacts. Our findings emphasize the importance of both extensive specimen collection and careful bioinformatic approaches in ascertaining dual genotype infections. IMPORTANCE: Novel recombinants of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) arise from coinfections with different lineages, but mixed infections are not screened for despite risk to public health, and most surveillance relies on single swabs. We analyzed a longitudinal data set with specimens from multiple body sites, providing an opportunity to assess intra-host dynamics. To distinguish true coinfection from bioinformatic artifacts with confidence, we applied a framework that grades evidence for mixed genotypes by incorporating lineage and clade with manually validated variant calls. This allowed investigation beyond abundance levels of mixed genotypes within a single specimen, including observations of compartmentalization and a recombinant virus. This work enables further study of evolutionary, immunological, and clinical implications of mixed SARS-CoV-2 genotypes. Detecting dual-genotype infections and discriminating between true dual-genotype infection vs potential bioinformatics-based artifacts support public health and military readiness. These efforts provide evidence to bolster decision-making in molecular epidemiological studies to track transmission and for the choice of effective countermeasures.