Loading
Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · September 17, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Pretraining a neural PDE surrogate can reduce the amount of new CFD data needed when geometry or modeled physics changes. However, it remains unclear how different components of distribution shift affect this benefit. We pretrain a surrogate on 254,909 RANS solutions from one airfoil family and fine-tune it on a new family under two target settings with matched freestream ranges: the same Spalart-Allmaras (SA) modeling and SA with added $e^N$ transition modeling. At $N=1000$, the pretrained model matches the accuracy of a model trained from scratch on $3.25\times$ as many samples for the same-SA target, but $2.58\times$ as many for the transition-modeled target. By $N=5000$, this ordering reverses ($1.56\times$ versus $1.86\times$). At $N=1000$, sampling more distinct airfoils lowers error on both targets, but only for the same-SA target is the gain increase larger than the observed draw-to-draw variation ($3.3\times$ to $4.0\times$). These results show that pretraining value depends jointly on target-data budget, target-data coverage, and whether source and target differ in modeled physics.