Loading
Standard Care Arm / Perinatal Mental Health / Lōvu platform · Interventional Study
ClinicalTrials.gov · August 14, 2026
Early or partial results. Treat as a signal, not a conclusion.
This is a recruiting feasibility pilot study designed to assess whether a randomized trial comparing a digital platform (Lōvu) with standard prenatal care is feasible and acceptable. No results are reported in this registry record; the study aims only to establish proof-of-concept and generate preliminary data on patient and clinician satisfaction before a larger RCT.
Interventional, Randomized, Parallel, Open label, Supportive Care purpose. Perinatal Mental Health; Female; age from 18 Years; to 45 Years; accepts healthy volunteers. Intervention: Lōvu-Augmented Arm. Compared with: Standard Care Arm — Active Comparator. n = 50. 1 site: United States.
This is a recruiting feasibility pilot study designed to assess whether a randomized trial comparing a digital platform (Lōvu) with standard prenatal care is feasible and acceptable. No results are reported in this registry record; the study aims only to establish proof-of-concept and generate preliminary data on patient and clinician satisfaction before a larger RCT.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
This record does not report results and carries no clinical implications. It documents a planned study whose primary purpose is to determine whether a future, larger clinical trial is feasible and acceptable to patients and providers.
This is a recruiting feasibility pilot study with no results reported; it aims to assess whether a future RCT is feasible, not to establish clinical efficacy.
As stated by the source record.
Quoted from the source exactly as published.
This record does not report results and carries no clinical implications. It documents a planned study whose primary purpose is to determine whether a future, larger clinical trial is feasible and acceptable to patients and providers.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
What is missing. This record has no key findings. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Registry record from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07766174). This is a study registration, not published results. Lead sponsor: University of Utah. Recruitment status: RECRUITING. Phase: NA. Study type: INTERVENTIONAL. Enrollment: 50 participants (ESTIMATED). Conditions: Perinatal Mental Health. Interventions: BEHAVIORAL: Lōvu platform; BEHAVIORAL: Standard Care Arm. Primary outcome measures: Feasibility Outcomes , 12 Months. Brief summary: The overall objective of this pilot study is to assess the feasibility of a RCT comparing Lōvu-augmented with usual prenatal care at UU. This would be a critical next step toward our long-term goal to identify technology-based interventions to improve maternal mental health in the Intermountain West. Our central hypothesis is that Lōvu will be both feasible and have high patient and clinician satisfaction, and that Lōvu-generated data will be a promising substrate for AI-based mental health risk stratification.
Taken from the source record, never inferred. Follow any of these and new work involving them reaches your briefing.