Loading
Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · September 21, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
What limits KV-cache compression at extreme bit-rates? We argue that it is not the choice of compression scheme, but how its budget is allocated across attention heads. Existing methods apply rank and bit-width uniformly, ignoring that each head has a different optimal mix of rank truncation and quantization. We show that co-optimizing rank and bit-width per head, using only standard low-rank projection and scalar quantization, dominates uniform allocation, with the largest gains at low bit-rates. Our method, KV-COBRA (Co-Optimized Bit-Rank Allocation), formalizes this as a resource-allocation problem: it balances rank-truncation loss against quantization loss within each head, then redistributes budget across heads to minimize total distortion. A fused Hadamard rotation equalizes per-channel variance, and reordering the SVD basis by attention-KL importance makes the solver query-aware. The same allocator extends to joint $K{+}V$ compression. On perplexity, zero-shot, and long-context benchmarks from $0.5$ to $4$ bits per dimension (bpd), KV-COBRA shows the smallest accuracy degradation among evaluated methods at low bpd, with no per-token overhead.