Loading
Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · October 20, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Online search activity is widely used as a digital trace of information seeking during epidemics, but its predictive value is often reduced to correlation, a selected lag, or a single forecast-error score. We examine eight pre-specified Google Trends-COVID-19 pairs in both directions using matched LightGBM forecasts over rolling 400-day windows and horizons of 1-14 days. Log-RMSE gain is combined with forecast-error distribution entropy (FEDE), which captures horizon-dependent changes in the signed error distribution. The resulting directional predictive signature comprises response class, RMSE effect, FEDE endpoint and early-slope responses, persistence across rolling regimes, and horizon profile. For screening candidate directions, we also introduce a relative persistence-weighted directional predictive response strength (DPRS) on a within-study 0-100 scale; 100 denotes the strongest observed response in the comparison set, not an absolute coupling maximum. The pairs show concordant, RMSE-only, FEDE-only, and mixed responses. "loss of smell" -> reported cases is accuracy-dominant, with mean log-RMSE gain 0.104 (about 9.9% equivalent RMSE reduction) and DPRS 100, whereas the reverse direction is FEDE-dominant (D_FEDE=0.048; DPRS=42). "covid test" -> positive rate is FEDE-dominant (D_FEDE=0.039; positive in 72% of windows; DPRS=98) despite negative RMSE gain, while "lockdown" -> stringency is the clearest concordant case (DPRS=78). World-level symptom/case pairs are less persistent. Thus, forecast accuracy and error-distribution dynamics are complementary, predictive effects can be direction- and metric-dependent, and forecast horizon is part of the relationship. Aggregated regime-level patterns should not be extrapolated to individual time points or interpreted as evidence of causality.