Loading
Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · November 2, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Graph forecasters for sensor networks are trained in one regime and deployed in others, where sensor coupling and signal frequency content both change. We split this spectral shift into an operator channel and a frequency channel, each with a dimensionless measure. ST-GFM (Spectral-Temporal Graph Forecasting Model) filters every input step with Chebyshev and bidirectional diffusion filters on one learned, non-symmetric operator and alternates them with per-node temporal attention. For the operator channel we prove Frobenius-norm perturbation bounds for both graph branches, show that the Chebyshev bound is attained to first order, and compute its constant from the trained weights and the measured operator norm: 17.9 on METR-LA and 21.5 on PEMS-BAY. Under random edge dropout the trained layer moves by 2.0% to 3.1% of this bound. Masked Spectral Reconstruction (MSR), a self-supervised loss active in the first 40 epochs, matches the log power spectrum of the encoder output to that of the input. For small log-spectral residuals on unclamped bins it is proportional to an Itakura-Saito divergence to leading order. Removing it raises the 60-minute MAE by 0.30 on METR-LA, close to the 0.33 lost when all three self-supervised losses go. Under one shared evaluation pipeline, the 60-minute MAE of ST-GFM is 3.5% below a retrained STAEformer on METR-LA and 13.0% below it on PEMS-BAY. Its 60-minute MAE is 3.0980.017 on METR-LA (five seeds) and 1.5760.006 on PEMS-BAY (three seeds), the lowest PEMS-BAY MAE among twelve published baselines.